Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Auto Circumcision: The Act of Faking Being Circumcised

Just when you think you've heard it all, you learn something new about the desirability of circumcision. Turns out that there are lots of males out there who wish they were circumcised but weren't. But instead of getting their filthy foreskins snipped, they retract their skin and leave it retracted all the time. WTF!

Apparently so many dudes do this that it's got a name: auto circumcision. Here's the definition of that in the Urban Dictionary: "the act of retracting the foreskin of the penis and keeping it retracted all the time so it appears to others to be circumcised; auto circumcision is popular among circumcision fetishists, especially some gays, who believe the circumcised penis is the most attractive; a dude who is auto circumcised looks cut to the casual observer in the locker room but still has his foreskin."

Does anyone know anyone who pretends to be circumcised? Can you tell the difference? And why would someone do this? Seems to me the answer is obvious. It's better to be circumcised! It's better to feel circumcised! It's better to look circumcised! In short, auto circumcision is the best proof ever that uncircumcised dudes wish they had had parents who would have done it right at birth. What do you think?

94 comments:

  1. Yes it's quite common. I am in Australia and uncircumcised, and I did it at school and even to this day in public showers!

    Appart from wanting it to look 'bigger and better', it also makes sense from a hygiene point of view to keep the foreskin back as much as possible, especially when showering.

    And I am certainly not the only one to do it!

    It sure would have been easier if I'd been circumcised at birth though!

    ReplyDelete
  2. hi, im in australia too, and before my circumcision at 18 i wore the skin back for 2 years.

    i did it because i really didnt like the skin and i am so glad i made the decision to have it cut. i would recomend it to anyone, adult, parents, everyone with a foreskin.

    i can totally understand why men wear it back, but they need to take the leap and have the circumcision. i think its wrong to leave your son uncircumcised, so i guess it is a bit sad for these men.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When I was young, it was difficult to get a circ on demand. So I kept my foreskin permanently retracted as the next best thing. But I was very relieved when at last I got cut.

    Retraction should only ever be a stage on the way to full circumcision. It is much better to make the glans exposure irrevokably permanent with a good tight cut.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sometimes its nice to have a break from being circumcised and enjoy your foreskin for a while before slinning back for ages and ages, you can only do this by not getting the surgery and just skinning back with a ring and condom or something

      Delete
  4. Your three correspondents are exceptional. The main reason intact men wear their foreskins back is that they live in circumcised communities that demonise the foreskin and would bully them if they knew they were intact. (Or like one man I met who said his mother had told him if he didn't keep it back, it'd be cut off.) Nothing to be proud of. I bet it's virtually unknown where circumcision hasn't taken hold, like Scandinavia, except among the crowd who are into piercings and the like.

    What it really illustrates is that NOT circumcising gives men the option. Forward or back - HIS choice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How totally wierd! Circucision should be for medical reasons only. It's not a fuckin' fashion accessory. Fools.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could not have said it better. I am in the US where i was circumcised a t birth and have tried everything possible to stretch the skin to have a foreskin again. Circumcision equals mutilation.

      Delete
    2. Fake! Foreskin is soo disgusting...

      Delete
  6. Thanks for all the good comments. Hugh7, I would bet that there are plenty of Scandinavians who like the look and feel of a clean-cut penis, so don't be surprised if many go for auto circumcision in those countries. Anon, I agree with you that the best reason to circumcise is medical, and there are plenty of sound health reasons to circumcise at birth and beyond. But, let's face it, the clean-cut penis IS a "fuckin' fashion accessory" (as you crudely put it) to many people. Women like the looks of it, and men, too. I wonder if skinning back the foreskin permanently, however, gives you any health benefits as opposed to the more permanent circumcision. Does anyone know?

    ReplyDelete
  7. there you go again hugh!

    anecdotes and little stories that may or may not have happened! typical of no-circ!!

    no-circ uses these kinds of 'stories', in utmost desparation, as the glue between its flimsy studies.

    because thats all no-circ is, convienient testomony, flimsy studies and sheer desperation.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah interesting point, PD.

    I think you would at least get some of the medical/hygiene benefits in terms of 'skinning back', but yes, utlimately you would think to get the full benefits, only a full circumcision would do.

    Hugh has lost the plot. The foreskin is totally redunant, and in too many cases, potentially harmful.

    It's 2009 - no boy should have to keep it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm a 19 year old uncircumcised guy in California, and I wish my parents had me circumcised at birth or when I was little.

    Even though I have a short foreskin (which can either look like a low circumcision or partial circumcision), the foreskin is like a really uncomfortable piece of clothing that you can't take off. No matter how much you tug and pull at it.

    The foreskin is just extra skin that's redundant and should be trimmed. If I have a son, I will definately have him circumcised.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Anon3 (the uncircd dude from California)! Hey, you can have your wish because it's not difficult to get circumcised at 19. Lots of dudes do it, and there are plenty of people to help you. Thanks for your comments, too. I like how you put it: "the foreskin is like a really uncomfortable piece of clothing that you can't take off . . . redundant and should be trimmed." So true, and it's never too late, dude.

    And, if you read some of my earlier posts like the one on Father's Day, you know that I reserve the highest praise to dads like the one you want to be -- uncircumcised fathers who circumcise their sons! Good luck, man. Let us know how we can help you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You disgust me, praising people for stripping their son's rights away and mutilating their penises, let them decide what they want to do, NOT EVERYONE'S OPINIONS ARE THE SAME AS YOURS

      Delete
    2. Fathers who have their baby sons routinely circumcised should be prosecuted for gross violation of the human rights of a helpless little boy. Being turned into a prepuce amputee without your owo informed consent is a transgression of the code of human rights of the UN.
      Routine baby boy circumcision is rapidly declining as people are aware of the negatives of being circumcised, including the right to an intact body.

      Delete
  11. I've thought about it for a while, but it's just that circumcision seems best when done as a baby or in childhood when it's more convenient.

    I've heard that adult circumcisions are more expensive (on family's insurance without having them knowing), with the stitches that means no erections and sex for a month or so, and I get around a lot than to wait for it to heal.

    When done as a baby or child, a boy doesn't have to worry about all that.

    And the circumcised penis with the head fully exposed just looks more beautiful. Most girls and women prefer it too. Looking back when I was little, I think that no boy should have to grow up with an elephant trunk. I would want to look different than an animal.

    It's just something I've been contemplating to get circumcised in the future a few years from now. But if I have a son, he will be circumcised.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Circumcision can only be done after an informed decision by an adult male. Parents can never play G*d to decide for their baby son to have his penis mutilated by cutting off the best part.

      Delete
  12. So a story I heard from a man himself when I asked why he wore his foreskin back is a "little story that may not have happend" but PD's wild speculation about the men of Scandinavia, based on no facts at all, is to be accepted as fact?

    It really wouldn't matter if every intact man in the world chose to keep his foreskin back ("auto-circumcision" is a really bad word for it), they would still have all the nerves, all the function and it would be their choice. This actually has nothing to do with circumcision, let alone infant circumcision.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for all the good comments -- even yours, Hugh7. I like hearing from the anti-circ foreskin lovers because you get a good insight into their flawed thinking. Hugh7 says auto circumcision has "nothing to do with circumcision." Dude, it's clear. If someone wants to skin back his foreskin ALL THE TIME so his clean-cut cock is revealed, I think that's a pretty obvious preference for circumcision, don't you?

    As for Anon3, the California dude who wants to be cut, I can understand your concern about costing your parents' insurance, plus they would know about it which you might not be comfortable with because they failed to circumcise you at birth. Here are my thoughts on that.

    First, don't blame your parents. Lots of parents in the 1980s were fooled by the anti-circs and the wishy-washy medical community. If they're good parents, they undertand that medical science advances and we now know the health advantages of getting rid of a filthy foreskin.

    Second, your insurance will cover you if a doctor orders it -- and lots of doctors will for all the obvious reasons. So check it out.

    Third, those who get cut as adults say it's not bad at all and sex is not delayed that long anyways. Plus it's a whole lot better after that 4 to 6 week wait, so it's worth it. And, as you said, a circumcised penis is beautiful and most women and girls prefer it. There are lots of dudes circumcised as adults who will help you. Let me know if you want that help. Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why do you keep calling it a "filthy foreskin"? That makes about as much sense as calling the clitoral hood, or the labia minora "filthy". They're only filthy if you have poor personal hygiene!

      I honestly don't think you need to be so militant about foreskins...

      Delete
    2. Too right! If you're foreskin's dirty, it's because you're too idle to wash properly! Get a shower for gods sake!

      Delete
    3. I keep mine back because it stays cleaner. I also dont have to always retract to take a piss. I thought about gettin cut years ago. Then stumbled upon a site of botched circumcisions. Who wants a scarred up cock an skin bridges? Whats so great about being circ'd? It doesnt help prevent you from getting HIV. The USA has the highest circ rate and the highest rate of HIV.... ive been with a few women who said they had never orgasmed til they had sex with me.. every other guy was cut that shed been with... lots of men that are cut are doin stretch techniques to re grow and restore their foreskin... lastly the forskin aint filthy. Its meant to be there. Use some dove soap an your all good n clean....

      Delete
  14. "If someone wants to skin back his foreskin ALL THE TIME so his clean-cut [sic] cock is revealed, I think that's a pretty obvious preference for circumcision, don't you?"
    No, because:
    1. He still has all the nerves
    2. He still has the option if he changes his mind
    3. It can still roll forward and back during intercourse and masturbation

    If keeping your foreskin back is just as "good" as circumcision, why circumcise?

    And if it is a preference for circumcision, it's still a tiny minority preference. By your own logic, most intact guys are voting for intactness with their foreskins!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I asked my doctor if I could be circumcised at 19. Sure, I grew up being incredibly self-conscious of my foreskin and quite frankly hated it. I also had a tight frenulum, which made masturbation uncomfortable. So, I asked my doctor, who referred me to a urologist.
    I told my parents, as I was convered on their insurance, and my parents didn't care one bit. If anything my mom felt a little remose for not circumcising me when I was born.
    To say you don't want to be circumcised because you can't jerk off/have sex for 4-6 weeks is beyond retarded. You're making a life improving choice. It's worth the tiny wait. Me being circumcised improved my self-image, gave me the opportunity to enjoy orgasms and sex the way every male should, and made me feel normal. That might be bullshit to the anti-circ feminazis, but I loved the change and would NEVER go back.
    When my wife was pregnant with my son, I knew I would want him circumicised right after birth- and he was.
    What boggles my mind is how many friends are pregnant/wives are pregnant and are unsure as to whether to circumcise, even if their husbands are cut.
    19 in Cali- just do it. Your doctor will likely make it work so that insurance covers it, and your parents most likely won't care or will even be remorseful (as mine were) they hadn't circ'ed you. You will be so much happier- and your woman will be to.
    (BTW- research conclusively shows American woman are much more likely to engage in oral sex with a circ'ed man than one with a foreskin)

    ReplyDelete
  16. A tiny nick to the frenulum (frenuloplasty) would have solved Anonymous' masturbation problem. It often resolves itself with a little tear.

    Circumcision was HIS CHOICE. Fine. All Intactivists are asking is that every male should have the same choice.

    But his self-consciousness about his foreskin derives ENTIRELY from living in a circumcising culture. With the US national rate now little over 50%, that will be a thing of the past to the generation growing up. If anything, it is the circumcised boys who may feel self-conscious from now on, and what can they do about that? (Well, restore their foreskins...)

    ReplyDelete
  17. The following seems strange: "Turns out that there are lots of males out there who wish they were circumcised but weren't. But instead of getting their filthy foreskins snipped, they retract their skin and leave it retracted all the time. WTF!"

    Why are you presuming that they do not keep their foreskins clean? Is the very idea of a foreskin inherently disgusting to you, "Provoking Debate". That's a fairly strange position. I think that you may have an issue with the prepuce which is transcendent beyond the medical, judging from this. You truly believe that it is impossible for a foreskin to be clean?

    As for your contention, the extension of a practice you have no evidence is common into a universal principle which applies for all of the intact is simply unfounded logically.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Foreskins are horrid. I got circumcised at 27 but I wish my parents had had be done as a baby, nice and tight with a neat brown circ ring. Adult circ is OK but not as neat.

    ReplyDelete
  19. If you remove all your teeth, you will never get a cavity, although I think we can all agree that brushing will suffice. I am not circumcised, and I would not circumcise my child because it is mutilation. You were born with it for a reason. I am sure alot of people could care less either way, but it is unfair to remove part of your child's body without asking them. Would you give your daughter breast implants at birth because it looks better? Not bloody likely. And for the record, sex feels better for girls with an uncircumcised penis, ask them.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Circumcision is the biggest waste of money on the UK NHS! Its totally unnecessary. Unless its going to cause you MAJOR health problems then leave it. Cleaner my arse! Why do you think you shower... As for those who think its neat is it what! When you are 30 odd and trying to have it with your wife (or Boyfriend/ civil partner Being nice to all here :D) and don't feel much then that's your fault or parents fault for MUTATING you. You wouldn't hack of your own nose because you wont get a cold and it looks better. Its totally STUPID! This whole Blog's just a HUGE joke. An argument to a problem that should never exist!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Wow, it really sounds like the author and some of the posters have circ fetishes!! Not a normal position at all!! The instance of complications with infant circs is quite high, 10% just for meteal stenosis alone... Urologists get 25% of their professional clients from people who need their circs fixed! All unneccessary procedures. You were born with this peice of skin, so why would anyone feel more "normal" having half their dick skin cut off?? I'm glad I left my son intact. That way he has a choice on what kind of cock to live with. And if he does have complications with his circ as an adult, he can sue the Doc who did it.. unlike if he had it as a baby, and the Doc cut off too much skin he'd never be able to find the bastard who messed up his dick!

    I think you are a staunch circ supporter for a reason. Maybe you have Daddy issues, and your Daddy was uncut and made you blow him or something. I don't know. But, why project your opinion onto other innocent children who have the right to their own opinions/ideas??

    ReplyDelete
  22. I wear my foreskin back. It's true, that I do like the LOOK of a circumcised penis.

    I do not, however want to LOSE my foreskin! The greatest pleasure I feel during sex is the womans pussy pushing my foreskin over itself. So intimate, so erotic ... I would not lose my foreskin for the world.

    I do understand though why people think circumcised looks better. I also love the feeling of my bare glans rubbing on my pants.

    I have the best of both worlds. Circumcised look, intact feeling, with the option to look intact too if for whatever reason I choose to do so.

    I will not be putting my children through irreversible surgery, I will however be encouraging them to wear their foreskins back.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anyone know a circumcision doctor in Vancouver?

    ReplyDelete
  24. is there any problem in keeping foreskin rolled back behind the glans...?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yeah - and I must say many of the comments here are really great.

    I kept my foreskin retracted for about six or seven months. Why did I do it? (and someone mentioned this above): Because I felt pressured to do so. I am 21 and from the midwest. Most guys are cut and to be uncut is very taboo. I went through about five or six years of intense debate over wanting to get circd, not wanting it...back and forth for years. At the highest point (a few months ago), after contacting a doctor in Florida, I went through a mental re-evaluation and honestly WOKE THE FUCK UP!

    I am so glad that my parents never cut me. After keeping the skin pulled back during those months, I loved feeling like my peers, but more than that I loved still having the mobility of skin, the nerves, etc. I DID IT SOLELY TO FIT IN.

    Now, I have sex with cut guys and can't help but think how sad for them that they have a penis that can do so little compared to mine. I know they can't help it, but subconsciously I can't help but feel bad for them.

    While I love the look of a cut penis AND love the look of an uncut one, I clearly prefer the function of an uncut one.

    So there's your answer. Is men choosing auto circumcision a justification for circumcision. Nope! Sorry, but actually quite the opposite. Auto circd men support being intact, because being intact, you can choose how to carry your penis a number of ways, choose a number of functions, and the best part: change these preferences over time!

    I wrote an article on circumcision which I posted on another post from this blog. I really don't mean to attack the core of this blog's philosophy, but unfortunately it's just not right to support this thing. If people want to choose to individually go against logic, that's fine. But we ought not pass falsities off as truth in order to justify our own shortcomings when it comes to ... the southern regions.

    http://expansionofspace.blogspot.com/2010/03/study-finds-that-cutting-off-fingers.html

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hi, im 18 yrs old, when i was 13 yrs old i started masturbating, after some time when i used to masturbate my skin moved back and the head started to come out it was really uncomfortable as a kid ( the skin being sensitive) i didnt know it was suppose to be like that ( wtf i know) so i kept pulling my skin front after some time i masturbated without the skin coming back ( head is not exposed), recently i noticed that the skin is suppose to be back but now it was hard for me to pull it back but i did it again and again in shower until the skin started coming backwards but it will not come up when it is below the head ,, so i had to pull it up , it was really very frustating and painful , but now i have just left it like that and its feels better and saves me hell lot of pain.
    So in my opinion if u are suffering from any pain and getting your skin back up or anything u should leave it like that ( auto-circumsized)

    ReplyDelete
  27. Interesting read! To put another slant on it, I'm uncircumcised. Whilst I'm still fully intact, I love to push it back and leave it that way. I kinda like the fact that, after a couple of days with it back, the head somehow loses sensation - I find that a good thing for me. Like another guy, I love the feeling of it rubbing against my boxers. Only trouble is, it won't stay that way. and I'm forever having to push it back.
    I've thought of being cut but I couldn't justify the cost. Recently I've told my wife how I keep it back all the time and have started making sure I push it back fully before "going in". She's said a couple of times that I should get it done but I don'y really know whether she means it. By the way, I'm 60.

    ReplyDelete
  28. 20 years ago I had a girlfriend who was obsessed with circumcised willys and wanted me to get cut to please her. She talked about other boyfriends she had who were cut and how taut and sexy they looked. From then on I wore my foreshin back and after a few weeks it mostly stayed back and felt great rubbing on my pants, the girlfriend liked it but still wanted to have me 'done'.I have kept it skinned back all this time and do not get an bad smells from smegma either. Now my wife likes to feel and see my flared glans through my pants and said she is not worried if I get cut or not and she offered to get the scissors out!

    ReplyDelete
  29. I have kind of an odd perspective on this, because I suffered from a condition called phimosis, where the foreskin is so tight that it cannot be pulled back over the head of the penis. I used to kind of wish I'd been circumcised, however after stretching it every day it gradually became looser until it became normal. When I first managed to pull my skin back, my bell-end was SO madly sensitive it was uncomfortable to touch it, but after a while it became desensitised more and more - it became much more pleasurable to rub the bare glans, though the sensitivity did decrease further. So while initially I thought "OMG how can cut guys stand this!?" I then came to realise a bare glans feels wonderful - as others have mentioned - rubbing against underwear. It's interesting to wear different materials too - the soft caress of fine cotton, or the boner-inducing roughness of going commando in tight jeans. For this reason and because I find the naked glans aesthetically superior, I wear my skin back. But would I have the snip? Never. I'm eternally glad I kept the phimosis to myself and researched how to fix it myself instead of submitting to a doctor's referral to be mutilated. There are just too many nerves and too much feeling in the skin to throw away.

    I should add that I have never had a problem with smegma or odour, even before I wore the foreskin pulled back. A shower and some soap is all that is needed, and I have never had a complaint about a bad smell or taste. I'm guessing girls who find foreskins disgusting have probably experienced or heard gossip about uncut guys with cheesy dicks. Yes there will be guys who don't keep it clean, just as there are people who don't keep their nails trimmed or their teeth clean or walk around with crusties in their eyes. It's just a matter of personal hygiene.

    Course if a man wishes to alter his body to make himself feel better, he should have that choice. But then if he's been cut as a baby he has no choice - he can't very well have a foreskin grafted on if he decides he wants one.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I do this quite often. It's the best of both worlds. My girlfriends have always preferred the natural uncircumcised look, but I love the feel of exposed glans.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Enjoy the loss of sensitivity faggots lol

    ReplyDelete
  32. If the (misnamed) auto circumcision "is the best proof ever that uncircumcised dudes wish they had had parents who would have done it right at birth", then foreskin restoration is the best proof ever that circumcised dudes wish they had had parents who would have left them intact at birth.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I do this and it is actually very common.
    After a while the foreskin shrinks and becomes identical to a circumcised one, keeping the same nerve endings.

    It's a safe way to have a circumcised penis without the operation.

    ReplyDelete
  34. WHAT DOES THE SPECIALIST SAY? IS THERE ANY HARM TO PULL IT BACK PARMANENTLY? DOES IT DESENSITISE TO MUCH?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, yes it does. you have 20,000 nerve endings on your penis tip when you are circumcised you loose over half of that over time. so yeah you do.

      Delete
  35. Someone sent me this link to see what I thought, and as a women I think this is the most stupid thing in the world. Having had sex with both cut and intact men, and quite a few of them, I much prefer a man with a foreskin. Sex for me is so much better, and I suspect it is for intact men too. Besides, once erect you really can't tell the difference just by looking.

    ReplyDelete
  36. My mom pulled my skin when i was like 5 yrs old..(forcefully seprated frm glans) n asked me 2 wear it back when i began growing in teen days i found my foreskin was undevloped n almost non existant..n nw ppl consider me loose circumcised.. my skin cant even be pulled forward. so i do have all nerves n circumcised look. All naturally

    ReplyDelete
  37. iwas cutat 27 the best thing i have ever done,as for masterbating it is great,and it looks good

    ReplyDelete
  38. Circumcision fetishist

    ReplyDelete
  39. Hey Guys, I'm 27 and Always wanted and wished I was Circumsied and love the look of them too! some uncut guys look good as well Lol....)

    I wanted to be cut very much, Always wanted my dam skin to stay back by itself out of the way Lol, I started useing the tapeing methods and would keep it back for some time week or so and love the feeling and wanking the glands dry when they dry out! not so long ago I figured out a new easy way of using tape (just a smaill thin pice on the skin that bunches up behind the glands) worked really well!!! :) I did lose some feeling i think and stared wearing it back down as norm, But go back and forth as the mood grabs me! would love to find a way it could be more premement still though and without tape or it looking bit odd with something holding it in place lol...

    Great blog. cheers :)

    ReplyDelete
  40. I wasnt circ'd when I was born bc I was sick. My mother asked the doc to do it but he said he didnt want to put me through anymore pain. My dad was pissed off bc I wasnt cut like hiwem. I pretended to be cut not because I wished to but bc it was the norm and everyone is full of shit but I dont care bc I can do things to a woman that a cut person cant so thats why a cut man buys ribbed condoms is that they are made to imitate the uncut penis. I am proud and I admit I still think about getting cut for religious reasons but the more people I hear from including doctors all say sex aint the same and your losing 2,000 or more nerves and the possiblity of something going wrong

    ReplyDelete
  41. yeah, I used to keep the foreskin back in Jr. High and High school and college. Loved the feeling of the bare knob and wished my parents had me cut when I was a baby. I wanted to be cut, and almost did the deed myself a couple of times (if I'd had the Internet when I was a kid, I probably would have circ'd myself; it's fairly easy). Finally got circ'd as an adult, and was amazed at how 'painless' it was. Nothing like my doc's described. Anyway, no more nasty foreskin.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Circumcision on a baby is mutilation. It should be a man's choice.

    I wear it back all the time because a buddy of mine suggested I do it to cure my extreme hypersensitivity. He had the same problem. And it has worked for me.

    Now I have all my nerves intact, I get more BJs anytime of the day, because I don't ever have smegma and if I want to I can pull my foreskin back forward to maintain my sensitivity throughout my life.

    My girlfriend says my uncircumcised penises feel better than circumcised and is happy with me. Circed penises pull all the lube out and thats crappy she says.

    So I would say the foreskin is very important. Its important for sex. Which is, all things considered, the most important thing, don't you think?

    ReplyDelete
  43. For gay men...docking pleasures mean, the more foreskin, the better. Before tossing it in the bin, maybe you should see what you're missing.

    ReplyDelete
  44. My mother also pulled my foreskin back when I was about 7 and told me to leave it there. It was so sensitive and distracted me for a while, but it didn't last long. My mum used to make sure it was back when i bathed every day. basically it began to feel normal and i forgot about it. Sometimes while i was still small i used to pull it forward to cover the tip sometimes, but it would feel strange by then (not used to it i guess) and i would pull it back again. Once i went through puberty and my penis grew the foreskin seemed to stay small, now i am unable to cover the tip of my penis with my foreskin and it remains uncovered all the time. I do not have enough skin to cover it, only about 1/3 of the way and it rolls straight back again if i do try to cover it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Got circumcised as a teen and have been happy since...besides a helmet looks better than a toque lol

      Delete
  45. I just made the comment above and would like to add that i am very happy with the way things are and would not want to change them. I have done the same to my son since he was 3

    ReplyDelete
  46. auto circumcision is the best, just try it.

    ReplyDelete
  47. i keep my forekin back and have done for years never had an infection like i had before i kep it back
    it allways stays nice and dry and i have
    it looks more normal in public showers
    it dosnt have any smell at all even after a week camping :O
    i would have like to of been circumcied at birth but now im 19 its too complicated and painfull
    the only thing is condoms are hard to use with a foreskin
    and girls love it when its allways kept back behind the head n a few girls have said it looks better than a circumcised penis because its all still there
    also my head seems to have gotten bigger and the foreskin has gotten smaller over he last 3 years of being "auto-circumcised"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really?
      How long does it take for the forskin to shrink and how much shorter does it get?

      Delete
    2. I'm intact and have quite a long skin, never found condoms difficult to use at all...you must be doing something wrong!

      Delete
  48. I either have very little foreskin or I have outgrown it (if that is possible) but I look circumcised all the time and the only time I see my foreskin is when I am shrivelled up due to cold weather or whatever. Pals in the pub and elsewhere tend to think I am circumcised if they spot me in the loo and I explain the situation as above.

    ReplyDelete
  49. P.S. to my reply of September 13th
    I thought my situation as given was the real meaning of auto-circumcision - almost a natural phenomenon NOT trying to fake being circumcised (though there is nothing wrong with that of course)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you are correct in assuming your condition is the true meaning of auto-circumcision. My bf is that way and the doctors explained it to him.

      Delete
  50. Circumcision must be mandatory because this procedure leads to transformation of glans' cylindric epithelium to plane. Such cancerogenenous viruses as papillomavirus can't persist on plane epithelium hence males never have cancer of penis and their women never have cancer of uterus colli. Now there are information about papillomavirus is a cause of many other cancers such as in prostate, anus, etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you just said a pile of fancy words that can be summarised into one sentence "circumcision will prevent cancer". Which in one sense is true and in another is not. Fore example if you have no foreskin your chances of getting cancer on your foreskin is pretty god damn low isn't it? Cancer is not contagious, having sex with a woman will not give her cancer. for something to be mandatory everyone must agree. 1/5 of the world circumcises on a regular basis America has the highest rate of circumcision, ironically it has the highest rate of Aids in the first world also. Prostate cancer is not caused by having a foreskin. It is caused simply by poor treatment of the prostate. many men are recommended to get their prostate checked between ages 35 to 45 as these are the highest rate for ages with prostrate problems. Kind of like breast cancer it's common like that. Yet i don't see anyone removing a baby girls breasts now do i? The uterus is not fundamentally connected to the foreskin. Though the frenulem is attached to the penis tip, in no way is it attached to the uterus. If you get cancer in your pee hole, its doubtful it's because you had a foreskin. You also stated cancer is a virus, i repeat it is a disease, there is a difference. The information you gave is biased entirely showing no benefits to the foreskin whatsoever. Stop brainwashing over concerned young adults.

      Delete
    2. Would you cut your finger tip off to prevent finger nail infection, or cut your balls off to prevent testicular cancer? We don't cut parts of people's bodies off to prevent possible infections!

      Delete
  51. Have worn my skin retracted since teens. Started leaving it back when about 15 because it used to trap hairs, got used to it and would never want it any other way now. Can still pull it partly over but it feels really strange and un natural now.

    ReplyDelete
  52. hey i am 19yrs,from India, I used to keep my foreskin retracted when I was 15. Some of my friends where circumcised. So i wanted to look like them.Then i started to keep my foreskin back.In the starting it was very difficult to stay back. As time passes it began to stay back. Now it stay back permanently. I love it.

    ReplyDelete
  53. you people really need to research the benefits of the foreskin, it's not just a piece of skin it has a valid function and is considered to be the eyelid of your dick. I am in no way exaggerating when i say that either. You have it like a woman has a clitoris for pleasure it's your clitoris, a man clitoris if you will the penis tip is just like the inside of a woman's vagina, soft weak, easily torn and ripped and it needs to be cleaned and taken care off that is what your penis tip is that is why it is so important to take care of it.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I am a 52yo guy in the Netherlands. When I was 15 I cut my frenum myself in order to make it easyer to keep the foreskin retracted. From the day on my foreskin was permanently retracted until a few years ago, when I was 47, I got rid of my foreskin. In the Netherlands circumcision is uncommon and I thought that only jewish and muslim boys were circumcised but through the internet I learned that you could be circumcised if you prefere to be so and I also learned that in the Netherlands there are specilised circumcision clinics to have it done. I wish I had known that much earlier, for I am very pleased to be circumcised now.

    Elmer,
    The Netherlands.

    ReplyDelete
  55. 31 year old father of four boys, uncut... and i have been keeping the foreskin retracted now since i was 13. my reason for starting this was a bad smell i got from the "smegma" even washing twice daily did not get rid of the smell. then one day a vrey strange thing happened when swimming. i was jumping from a bridge maybe 25 feet up into the local river. i got a tingleing sensation and an immediate errection.on further investigation at home a few hours later in the shower i found the foreskin had gone back behind the glans, i had noticed whilst watching TV that i did not smell tonight. i pulled it back to its normal position. the following morning the smell was back. i showered and decided to pull back the skin to the point it went to on its own the day before and went swimming again with my friends. i did like the way it felt and looked in my shorts. so took the decision that was how it would stay. never had the smell since.

    my sons have always tried to keep their skins retracted from an early age, i did give them the coice and also gave them the benefits. so they did make the decision themselves. the youngest 4 starts school in september and has just ben for the medical the nurse was convinced he had been circumsised, untill he showed her that the skin would go back. none of the boys skins will fully cover the head, not sure if this is because of keeping the skin retracted or not. but they all like the way it looks and feels.

    i see no reason for a medical procedure to have the skin removed if practice keeping it retracted has the same result. plus you do have the choice later in life if you want the skin back or not.

    ReplyDelete
  56. I keep my foreskin retracted, and have done for many years. I simply like the look and feel of the exposed glans. Certainly the glans has got bigger as result of not being confined by the foreskin.

    Loads of guys have foreskins that retract on their own, leaving a exposed glans, just as loads of guys have very long foreskins with an overhang of an inch or more. So to say a foreskin 'ought' to do this or that is not really helpful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The wearing of intact foreskin retracted happens all over the world even partly accidentally. There are cultures as some in Japan where it is expected to be the norm in adulthood- and it does look more adult.

      There should be more promotion and understanding and acceptance of this practice.

      Delete
    2. I availed myself of auto-circumcision for about a third of my adult life and it served me well.

      Upon encountering this site it was at first dismayed at the statement that it was being done as "faking circumcision" but on rethinking it can consider that as a very complementary description for it does a very good job of providing all of the benefits of circumcision without necessitating surgery. It can often only be told from a circ by very close examination. It does provide the same type of view of the penis as the circumsised, can pass the casual siting as a circed penis. It does provide the aeration of the glans area to help easy cleanliness. It is copes as well with stock useage of the standup urinal followed by no further cleaning or blotting as a circ.
      In addition to the view that it presents it also imparts the ability to directly feel the glans itself when reaching down there. It also provides the extra sensations when clothing touches the bare glans. It eliminates smegma and the odor from urine that gets retained in a forward foreskin.
      If you read forums with questions by teen makes you will note that many of the queries are about real problems with the uncircumcised penis, foreskin related.

      If auto-circ gets called faking circumcision it does it well enough to confer all the benefits and should be "advertised" to a wider audience.

      Delete
  57. I agree with you, this blog is of a MENTALLY ILL Man! A pedophile who likes to see baby boys amputated sextually

    ReplyDelete
  58. I had recurrent balanitis for 3 years. My doctor kept insisting on a circumcision. I searched the internet and read what it was like to be circumcised and made the appointment for circumcision. I read somewhere that keeping foreskin retracted can reduce the sensitivity of glans and make it more comfortable after circumcision. I started to wear the silicone ring like on wiki pictures http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Foreskin_retraction_glans_penis_ring.jpg
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Silicone_glans_ring.jpg
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Penis_with_glans_ring.jpg
    After 3 weeks of wearing glans uncovered the balanitis was completely gone and I canceled the circumcision appointment. I wear the silicone glans ring all the time ,started this 2 years ago and have no problems since.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Foreskin is important erogenous tissue that protects the inner foreskin and glans, provides comfort, provides a gliding action during intercourse, and contains thousands of very sensitive, pleasure producing nerves. Circumcision exposes the glans and inner foreskin (which are mucuous membrane) to air and abrasion, causing the layer of keratin to deepen significantly. This process continues throughout a man's lifetime, further desensitizing the penis. The following structures are completely lost to circumcision: the ridged band, most or all of the frenulum, most of the inner foreskin, and more than half of the penile skin. Circumcision explains the problems of discomfort, dryness, skin tears, uncomfortable erections, and lack of proper sexual function that circumcised men experience; some more than others, depending on how much skin was cut off by the butcher. Genital cutting is mutilation and a violation of basic human rights and medical ethics. Keep your baby boys intact and whole as nature intended.

    Even oral sex is more comfortable and less abraisive with intact men because the contact will be mucuous membrane against mucous membrane rather than dry, rough, keratinized skin against mucuous membrane; hence a lower chance of getting sore or minor tears.

    The foreskin allows men to masturbate with their own skin without the necessity of using lube. All male species are born with a foreskin. The glans and inner foreskin are internal organs that are meant to remain smooth and moist (just like our eyelids and gums in our mouth) and protected by the foreskin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was raised in the 50s and 60s and never told anything about retraction or circumcision. The young people now have so much information on the internet that we didn't have back then. I was not circumcised and told nothing about cleaning it. We had no indoor plumbing not much privacy. My foreskin would get stinky and sore. Most of the boys in school were circumcised. I found out that if I retracted the skin it stayed a lot cleaner and didn't stink and get sore. I didn't know if this was bad or harmful so I would let it cover or it would often cover by itself in a short time. I later learned that by turning the skin in under itself, it would stay back a lot better,so I started doint that and going bare as much as possible. This worked out fairly well but in hot weather it would sweat up and slide over the head and get sore. I had a very long elefant trunk foreskin which was difficult to keep behind the head. After years of keeping it retracted I was hoping it would shorten but it never did. Young boys should get information on this so they can start early before puberty and then it will stay back better as the skin will not grow as long. At age 32 I got a circumcision when I needed another surgery.What a releif! I am now 64 and have no regrets but wish I had been told about keeping retrated before puberty. Then there would have been no need for getting cut. It is so much cleaner and better with a bare head.

      Delete
  60. I'm Mark from the Netherlands and wore my foreskin retracted since I was 13yo. A friend of mine showed me how to do it and why it was good. He still had a tight foreskin and was advised to retract it as much and far as possible to prevent circumcision. Mine was quite tight too at that time so I did the same. When I was 17 yo I wanted to make it permanent and asked my PD for a circumcision. He was very pro-circ so within 2 months I was rid of my (now fully retractible) foreskin. So much the better and I never regretted it.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Hi Guys. iam from the UK where you dont see a huge amount of circumcision, some religious groups or for a medical reason. when i was 12 i had been getting problems with the build up of smegma, even showering twice a day would not keep it away, now i dont know if you would call it good luck or bad luck but whilst jumping large waves that year on holiday i suffered an accident. the frenulum got torn byt thforce of the water entering the end of the foreskin.it hurt like hell and in the water i noticed blood coming from the injury. i did not want to admit this to my parents as they had advised me not to go swimming that day. so i stayed inthe water until the bleeding stopped. i did not really know what the damage was at first but when i got home that evening i had a good look in the shower. it had torn in 2 places and left the forskin fully retracted. i did wonder why i was erect the whole way home. it must have been the head of my penis rubbing inside my speedos. it still hurt but not so bad. i thought at the time it did look neater so i decided to leave the skin in there fully retracted. my parents found out eventually i think about 3 years later on holiday my younger brother walked in on me in the shower saw my penis looked different than his and he went to ask dad. so i had to explain. but it was not so bad and dad said he had done the same when he was younger just that none of ue had seen. after then i never got any smegma building up so that was a good result. it was easier to pee.

    now i am the father of 2 sets of twin boys the oldest 2 are 13 and the youngest 2 are 9. the older 2 have also kept their skins retracted for at least 4 years now. i asked them if they would consider having the skin removed, both said no they prefer to have a similar look without the pain. now they did have some problems in the early stages. with the skin rolling back to cover the end of the penis. this was wearing boxers when this was happening. i read somewhere that tight fiting underwear would help. both boys love to go swimming and wear speedos to swim, so i made a suggestion to them try wearing their speedos for a week and see if that helped. it did, they still had the roll back problem at night as they wore pyjamas without underwear to sleep and each morning the skin had returned to cover the end. so without me knowing they had started wearing the speedos to sleep. after another week they told me what they had tried and found it to work. so that is what they do now. i can also say it looks better as one of the older boys when he went for a pee was/is too lazy to shake off all the drips of pee, which used to stay in the baggy foreskin he would end up with wet patch on his speedos and sometimes it soaked into his shorts when we were on holidays. with the skin retracted it is not so much of a problem but i suspect he is now haking the drips of more. sometimes they do wear those boardshorts to swim and the skin stays retracted better now but they do prefer the speedos for support.

    the younest 2 boys have started wearing their skin in the retracted position at the start of the summer, they saw what their oler brothers looked lke and getting a little more inquisitive they asked their older brothers for advice. then they came running to me asking for speedos. they had always worn boxers as underwear and baggy shorts for swimming. now they have gone for the speedos in a big way and they say the new position for the skin makes them look "bigger", they are two of the biggest show offs i know. but if they like their body and are proud of it then i dont have a problem there.

    all four boys have had school medical exams and the nurse has not commented on the boys skin being retracted, maybe they thought they had been circumcised??.

    ReplyDelete
  62. From what I have read on other sites/forums keeping the foreskin back is not uncommon at all.It is a great way to prepare to be circumcised if you are an uncut teen or adult.I'm working on training my to stay back to prepare for getting circumcised.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I have 2 sons adopted from other countries who arrived intact. It was their choice to remain so. Auto circ would allow them to mimic or look like circ'd peers if they chose, without the surgery that like a tattoo is rather permanent. I favor the idea that a guy should choose for himself, and if he tires auto circ and doesn't prefer it, he can go back. I offered my boys a circ which they declined. Even now they could look that way if they chose, without the surgery. I am fine that my grandson is intact and the choice will be his, including trying the feel of the look that was not imposed upon him. If he wants! Since a guy who is circ'd still needs a condom, the medical benefits are way overblown. And, being intact is still the "norm" around most of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I'm of Chinese ethnicity but grew up in Indonesia, where the almost all boys are circumcised around puberty. Since my family wasn't Muslim, I never got circumcised. I was greatly embarrassed by my foreskin. As my classmates got circumcised one-by-one, I started to stand out. Our school nurse, who did our yearly health exams, also kept urging me to get circumcised. I actually discovered "auto-circumcision" by myself around age 16. By this time, all the other males, save a few Chinese or foreign-born students were circumcised. I noticed that keeping my foreskin retracted permanently not only helped reduce the smell (and smegma), but also lessened the sensitivity of my glans. I used to ejaculate within about 2 minutes of masturbation before I kept the skin back. Soon afterward, the time more than doubled. I also liked the fact that exposing the glans made my penis look a little larger. Being of Asian descent, I am not well-endowed (about 4.5 inches fully erect). I only see benefits to having a circumcised penis!

    ReplyDelete
  65. When I was a kid in middle school in California, we would have to shower after p.e. I hated it, I was uncut and it seems every boy in class was cut. I would roll my foreskin back. It work pretty good, I didn't have a lot of foreskin , you could see the tip of my penis when the skin was down. But when I got into my twenties, I went and got cut. Best thing I ever done for my self. No worry' s in the gym now.

    ReplyDelete
  66. As a father of 4 boys all under 14 the youngest being just 8. i found quite early in life the benefits of retracting the foreskin. it is cleaner and i think Looks better. the wife thinks so to. now to my 4 boys. the oldest had a problem with an infection on the head of his penis at the age of about 7. cant remember the name of it but it produced a bad smell and got sticky. the doc gave him cream and tablets. it took almost a month to cure. at the time i read somewhere that keeping the skin retracted would help prevent this type of infection, basically caused buy something getting between the head and the foreskin.. i told my son how to do this and at first he did have problems keeping the skin rolled back. but he kept trying and within a couple of months he was staying rolled back 24/7. one thing that did help was it being summer and he was swimming a lot with me after school so he wore speedos a lot, but he did say that when he changed into boxers after swim the skin was trying to unrol again. so we got him to wear speedos a lot more which were snug fitting, this did keep the skin from unrolling.

    all 4 boys share a bedroon so they all saw his penis regular, which sparked questions. so all in turn as soon as they were able started rolling back the skin. the youngest was very young when he started and now none of them have had any infections. and all like the look and the feel of the uncovered head. the youngest was the easiest he wore speedos from before he was dry all day. it helped him not to pee himself during the day with the promise of swimming at night if he stayed dry. and he kept his skin rolled back from 3 or 4.

    all have had medical exam and no questions were asked, apart from a smile from the doc at their choice of speedos for underwear. i see no reason for having an operation when this result can be had from an early age.

    ReplyDelete
  67. yes, I've done it at times for years. I love the feeling of the naked head rubbing against underwear at times. keeps me semihard, but don't want to go thru circumcision.

    ReplyDelete
  68. i have done this since i was 14 years of age, i always wanted to be circumcised but never got it done, im now 31 and i look circumcised but still have all my foreskin. ive kept it retracted for 16 years now, my gf's all thought i was circumcised and so did my wife. its a great feeling having the head out and it seems my foreskin has shrunk heaps.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Last year my avg time for sex was 16min but now after 3 months of keeping it retracted completely my oversensitivity was gone and my time now is 30-44 mins man....its just fucking great...i think it will also be a cure for premature ejaculation....guys before complaning just try it for at lest 2 weeks

    ReplyDelete
  70. Last year my avg time for sex was 16min but now after 3 months of keeping it retracted completely my oversensitivity was gone and my time now is 30-44 mins man....its just fucking great...i think it will also be a cure for premature ejaculation....guys before complaning just try it for at lest 2 weeks

    ReplyDelete
  71. I am 26yrs old Indian. I have been keeping my foreskin retracted for 3 yrs. I always wanted to be circumcised but in our society it is not accepted or discussed among hindus so i remained intact for 23yrs long. One day i woke up in the morning with a hard on and the skin was fully retracted. I thought i should keep it like that. After the erection gone it rolled forward but i pulled it again and put into my underwear. About 2 months or so i kept it that way and finally got the permanent settlement. Now i am moved to another city for work and here in malls movies where the partitions between two urinals are so little that one can see others penis clearly, i see many guys are like me. So now the boys of india wants exposed glans. I have planned to go under circumcision as i have opportunity now. Bare glans is healthy glans.

    ReplyDelete
  72. have been fully retracted for many years, since teens, youthful erections caused skin to retract and trap hairs on return, only solution seem to be trim hair or retract foreskin. I did not fancy a lifetime of cutting pubic hairs so retracting foreskin won out. There was some discomfort at first but it soon passed and eventually skin stayed back. The longer it was back the better it felt so now years later that is the natural position and if I pull it over (not much is covered) it feels totally strange and usually rolls right back.

    ReplyDelete
  73. I just found this article and all the comments yesterday, and read everyone of the comments and found them all very interesting.

    The end result of all this reading. Well 60 years on I can still say with great pride I'm still glad Mom & Dad had me circumcised at birth. Growing up, friends, male relatives, classmates were all circumcised. It was the norm then and sad to say now in Canada that does not seem to be the case at least according statistic.

    So I have never had to retract a foreskin to remain dry and clean and more visually appealing to look at. I'm glad to no that there appears to be a lot of guys out there that realize that even though they were not circumcised they can keep there penis clean and a lot healthier by retracting and keeping there foreskins retracted all the time.

    Personally I still believe that all males should be routinely circumcised at birth but realize that will probably never happen but at least a lot of guys have the good sense to keep there foreskins retracted all the time.

    Visually the circumcised penis to me is more attractive and I've never had a lover say to me I wish you had a foreskin.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Filthy foreskin? Wish they were circumcised? This is total nonsense that you've written just because you're angry that most males in the world have their whole penises and you don't. In other countries, we discovered this amazing way to keep the penis clean: wash it. We don't chop off body parts instead of washing them like batshit crazy lunatics.

    ReplyDelete